Absolute and relative dating archaeology updating your device ios 5

Lets discuss the two dominant theories as to the date and pharaoh of the exodus.• The early date theory has the year of the exodus somewhere in the 1440s B. during the time of the 18th Egyptian dynasty with Amenhotep II as pharaoh.In I Kings 6:1 the Scriptures say: "And it came to pass in the four hundred and eightieth year after the children of Israel were come out of the land of Egypt, in the fourth year of Solomon's reign over Israel, in the month of Zif, which is the second month that he began to build the house of the Lord." One can readily see that the times for both the Exodus and the beginning of the Temple have been specifically stated in God's Word. Amenhotep's predecessor, Thutmose III, is the only pharaoh within the time specified in I Kings 6:1 who reigned long enough (54 years) to have been on the throne at the time of Moses' flight and to die shortly before his return to Egypt.Scholars have identified the fourth year of Solomon's reign as 966 B. This would make Thutmose III the pharaoh of the Oppression and Amenhotep II the pharaoh of the Exodus.1 Kings 6:1 states that Solomon began building the Temple in the fourth year of his reign, 480 years after the Exodus.

The Old Testament contains many clear references to the deaths of enemy kings, most of them much less important than this pharaoh.

Archaeology proves that Amenhotep II ruled for about 22 years after the Exodus.

3 - Historical Evidence for Moses & Pharaoh In Cecil B Demille's classic The Ten Commandments staring Charlton Heston, Yul Brynner plays the role of Pharaoh Ramesses in one of the all time great bible movies about Moses.

History tells us that for several years after 1445 B. Amenhotep II was unable to carry out any invasions or extensive military operations. He also concluded that the walls of the city toppled outward, which would compare favorably with Joshua .

This would seem like very strange behavior for a pharaoh who hoped to equal his father's record of no less than seventeen military campaigns in nineteen years. This means that Thutmose IV was not the firstborn son, who would have been the legitimate heir. Scholars have been fascinated by a revolutionary religious doctrine which developed shortly after 1445 B. that threatened to sweep away the theological dogmas of centuries.

Search for absolute and relative dating archaeology:

absolute and relative dating archaeology-45absolute and relative dating archaeology-49

But according to the Bible, Ramesses could not have been the Pharaoh of the Exodus.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

One thought on “absolute and relative dating archaeology”

  1. The greatest mistake the modern woman makes is to suppose she can graft a girl - the girl she once was or another girl entirely - on to her ageing features.